图书情报知识 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 125-133.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2022.03.125

• 情报、信息与共享 • 上一篇    下一篇

社交媒体环境下公众对科研诚信的认知与评价——以知乎问答社区为例

王琳,江雨薇   

  • 出版日期:2022-05-10 发布日期:2022-07-30

Public Cognition and Evaluation of Scientific Research Integrity in Social Media Environment: A Case Study of Q&A Community Zhihu

  • Online:2022-05-10 Published:2022-07-30

摘要: [目的/意义]科研诚信作为科技创新和社会进步的基石,其治理需要社会各界的共同参与。分析公众对科研诚信的认知与评价,有助于更加全面地了解其对学术不端行为的态度和看法。[研究设计/方法]以知乎平台为例,运用共词分析和文本情感分类等方法,探究社交媒体环境下公众对科研诚信问题的认知与评价。[结果/结论]社交媒体环境下公众对科研诚信的认知与评价呈现出以下特点:评论内容单一,对科研诚信认知不足;价值基调正向,对科研人员给予肯定和信任;社会对科研不端高度关注,并持负面批评态度。基于研究结果进一步提出了公众视角下对科研诚信治理和建设的启示。[创新/价值]从公众视角总结科研诚信认知与评价的特征并提出建议,为我国科研诚信的全面建设与发展提供参考。

关键词: 科研诚信, 科研不端, 公众视角, 共词分析, 情感分类

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Scientific research integrity is the cornerstone of technological innovation and social progress, and its governance requires the participation of all sectors of society. Analysis of public cognition and evaluation of scientific research integrity is helpful to more comprehensively understand their attitudes and views on academic misconduct. [Design/Methodology] Taking the Zhihu platform as an example, using methods such as co-word analysis and text sentiment classification, this paper explores public cognition and evaluation of research integrity issues in the social media environment. [Findings/Conclusion] Public cognition and evaluation of scientific research integrity in the social media environment has the following characteristics: the content of the comments is single, and the awareness of research integrity is insufficient; the value tone is positive, and the scientific research personnel are affirmed and trusted; the society pays high attention to research misconduct and holds a negative and critical attitude. Based on the research results, the study  further puts forward the enlightenment of research integrity governance and construction from the perspective of the public. [Originality/Value] From the perspective of the public, this paper summarizes the characteristics of their cognition and evaluation of research integrity and put forward suggestions, so as to provide references for the comprehensive construction and development of research integrity in China.


Key words: Scientific research integrity, Research misconduct, Public perspective, Co-word analysis, Sentiment classification