图书情报知识 ›› 2016, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 71-79.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2016.03.071

• 情报、信息与共享 • 上一篇    下一篇

文献计量学研究共同体的特征与变迁:1994—2014年

李江,李东,俞欣辰   

  • 出版日期:2016-05-10 发布日期:2016-05-10

Characteristics and Evolution of the Research Communities of Bibliometrics:1994-2014

  • Online:2016-05-10 Published:2016-05-10

摘要:

论文基于Web of Science数据库收录的1994-2014年文献计量学相关的4251篇期刊论文,采用文献计量学方法,分析了国际学术界内文献计量学研究共同体的学科背景、区域分布、主题偏好、期刊偏好等特征及历史变迁。研究发现:(1)无论是发文数量还是被引次数,图书情报学领域学者在文献计量学研究中的地位近年均呈现明显的下降趋势,其主体地位已被医学领域学者取代;(2)美洲与东欧在文献计量学中的地位日渐式微,而亚洲和西欧的地位日渐崛起,中国、中国台湾、西班牙等国家和地区的发文占比均大幅增加;(3)在过去二十年里,文献计量学相关研究的热度在持续大幅上升,文献计量学研究的热点主题集中在研究方法(如引文分析、网络分析)与指标(影响因子、h指数及衍生指数)等,而在一定程度上忽视了基础规律研究,文献计量研究共同体的发文偏好主要集中在图书情报学期刊,但经济学与医学领域的学者更倾向于在本领域发表文献计量学相关论文。另外,论文还讨论了文献计量学与其他学科交叉的特征与趋势。

关键词: 文献计量, 研究共同体, 研究趋势, 研究热点, 学科交叉

Abstract:

Based on 4,251 bibliometricsrelated articles collected from the Web of Science during 19942014, this paper examined the disciplinary background, geographical coverage, thematic preference and favorite journals of the authors, from a bibliometric perspective. The first finding is that Library & Information Science (LIS) has been overshadowed by Medicine in both publications and citations, involving bibliometric studies. Second, in the area of bibliometrics the status of Americas and East Europe has been declining, instead, the status of Asia and West Europe has been keeping on a rise. Last but not least, the focus on bibliometrics has been rising steadily during 19942014, most bibliometric studies focused on citation analysis, network analysis, impact factor, h index and additional derivatives etc., meanwhile, fundamental bibliometric principles were ignored. Most of the authors preferred to publish their bibliometricrelated work in LIS journals, except economists and medical scientists who preferred journals in their own fields. Furthermore, this paper discussed the trend of interdisciplinarity concerning bibliometrics.

Key words: Bibliometrics, Research community, Research trend, Research focus, Interdisciplinarity