图书情报知识 ›› 2016, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 53-61.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2016.05.053

• 情报、信息与共享 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于网络结构的科研单元的科研范式研究

陈云伟,许轶,王立娜,徐婧,方曙   

Network-based Analysis on Scientific Paradigm of Scientific Research Unit

摘要:

旨在构建一套分析科研单元科研范式的方法,用于研究科研单元的科学研究的学科结构以及研究人员开展科学研究的行为特征。基于本文对科研范式的定义,提出从基于引文网络和科学家合作网络的结构来研究科研单元的科研范式的方法,分别利用CitNetExplorer和Sci2软件研究引文网络和科学家合作网络。选用美国、英国和中国的3家量子信息领域的国际领先科研单元(CASQC、MITQIT、OXFORDQ)为实证分析对象。实证分析发现,CASQC科学家合作网络呈现出明显的社团特征,学科相对较窄,而MITQIT和OxfordQ的科学家合作网络却呈现出稀疏的弱合作特征,科学家合作网络密度低而直径大,学科领域均匀且多样化。实证分析结果表明该方法可有效地剖析科研单元的科研范式,具有较好的应用效果。

关键词: 引文网络, 合作网络, 科研范式, 科研单元, 量子信息

Abstract:

This paper constructs a method for evaluating the scientific paradigm of scientific research units, which is a tool used to carry out the analysis on the structure of science field and the behaviour features during the process of scientific activities. A method based on the structure of citation networks and collaboration networks had been used to study on scientific paradigm. Three scientific research units, CAS-QC, MIT-QIT and OXFORD-Q respectively from China, USA and UK in the field of quantum information were used for case study. Results showed that the clusters of CAS-QC were divided much denser than the other two units, while the collaboration networks of MIT-QIT and Oxford-Q were much more sparse than CAS-QC with lower densities and higher diameters. The citation networks indicated that the scopes of the research of MIT-QIT and Oxford-Q were much more extensive than CAS-QC.