图书情报知识 ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 60-72.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2017.06.060

• 情报、信息与共享 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于开放数据晴雨表的我国政府数据开放提升路径分析

张晓娟,孙成,向锦鹏   

  • 出版日期:2017-11-10 发布日期:2017-11-10

The Paths to Promote Government Data Openness in China: An Analysis based on the Open Data Barometer

  • Online:2017-11-10 Published:2017-11-10

摘要:

本文以开放数据晴雨表为依据,采用定量分析的方法从准备度、执行度、影响力三个评估指标的角度分析我国政府数据开放现状,总结已有成果和问题。研究发现我国准备度尚可,尤其是地方政府行动表现突出,但执行度和影响力目前还比较落后,数据集的开放程度不高,政府数据开放对政治、社会、经济的影响不足。根据量化分析的评估结果,本文从准备度、执行度两个视角具体探究我国政府数据开放的提升路径,并结合开放数据晴雨表的指标关联性特征计算提升后的预期结果。两个视角的提升路径均有实践意义,可以结合我国国情和现状进行选择,本文采用比较分析的方法对两种提升路径的选取方向、特点和优势进行了比较,并对我国政府数据开放的进一步提升提出了建议。

关键词: 开放政府数据, 数据开放, 开放数据晴雨表, 提升路径, 评估

Abstract:

The paper uncovered the present situation of government data openness in our country from the perspective of three indexes of open data barometer including readiness, implementation and impact, and summarized the existing achievements and problems by  using quantitative analysis method. The study found that only the score of the readiness index is above average, especially the CITY sub-index is outstanding, while the implementation index and impact index are still relatively backward. The datasets are barely truly open and open government data has little impact on political, social and economic development in our country. Based on the results of quantitative analysis, the paper explores two paths to promote China’s government data openness from the perspective of readiness and implementation, and calculates the expected results with index relevance. The two paths are all of practical significance and can be chosen combined with China’s national conditions. The paper uses the method of comparative analysis to make a comprehensive comparison of the two paths from the perspective of selection direction, characteristics and advantages. Finally this paper puts forward some suggestions on the further improvement of government data openness in China.

Key words: Open government data, Data openness, Open data barometer, Paths of promotion, Assessment