图书情报知识 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 60-66.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2024.02.060

• 图书、文献与交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

20世纪以来中国目录学史书写回顾与展望——以通论性目录学史著作为中心的考察

谢欢   

  1. 南京大学信息管理学院 ,南京,210093
  • 出版日期:2024-03-10 发布日期:2024-05-14
  • 通讯作者: 谢欢(ORCID:0000-0003-3883-2382),博士,副教授,研究方向:图书馆史、文献学,Email:xiehuan@nju.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系南京大学亚洲研究重点项目“北美文理学院藏中国文献目录提要”(2023300038)的研究成果之一。

Review on the Study History of China’s Bibliography History Since 20th Century: Based on the Analysis of General Historical Works of China’s Bibliography History

XIE Huan   

  1. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093
  • Online:2024-03-10 Published:2024-05-14
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to XIE Huan, Email:xiehuan@nju.edu.cn, ORCID:0000-0003-3883-2382
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the Key Project on Asian Studies "Annotated Bibliography of Documents on China in North America's Liberal Arts Colleges"(2023300038)supported by Nanjing University.

摘要: [目的/意义]相较于中国目录学史的研究,学界对于中国目录学史研究史的梳理略显不够,通过梳理20世纪中国目录学史研究史,为新时代中国目录学史的研究与书写提供历史借鉴。[研究设计/方法]以20世纪以来出版的姚名达著《中国目录学史》、王重民著《中国目录学史论丛》、吕绍虞著《中国目录学史稿》、倪士毅著《中国古代目录学史》、乔好勤著《中国目录学史》、余庆蓉著《中国目录学思想史》以及柯平著《中国目录学史》7本通论性目录学史著作为研究对象,通过系统研读、分析与比较,借以梳理20世纪中国目录学史的书写路径。[结论/发现]20世纪以来中国目录学史书写呈现出如下特点:(1)历史学、图书馆学学者是中国目录学史书写的两大核心主体;(2)线性进化史观逐渐成为中国目录学史书写的主流史观;(3)书写的焦点由“以目录为中心”到“目录与人并重”。[创新/价值]在此基础上提出了未来中国目录学史书写展望:(1)明确“目录学史”的内涵;(2)明确“以西释中”还是“以中释中”;(3)明确中国目录学史的中心是“人”;(4)探索多体裁的中国目录学史书写形式;(5)拓展中国目录学史的关注视域。

关键词: 中国目录学史, 中国目录学史研究史, 中国图书馆学史

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Compared with the study of the history of China's bibliography, the academic community paid little attention on the history of the historical study of Chinese bibliography. The study aims to give some advices for the research and the writing on Chinese bibliography history in the future by reviewing the study history of China's bibliography history since 20th century. [Design/Methodology] Taking 7 general historical works of China's bibliography history published since the 20th century as object, which are as follows: Yao Mingda's History of China's Bibliography, Wang Zhongmin's Serial Works on China's Bibliography History, Lyu Shaoyu's Draft History of China's Bibliography, Ni Shiyi's History of Ancient China's Bibliography, Qiao Haoqin's History of China's Bibliography, Yu Qingrong's History of China's Bibliographic Thought, and Ke Ping's History of China's Bibliography, through systematic study, analysis and comparison, this paper sorts out the writing path of Chinese bibliography history in the 20th century. [Findings/Conclusion] This article summarizes the following characteristics emerged in the study history of China's bibliography history since 20th century:(1)scholars from the fields of history as well as the library science are the two majors who interested in the China's bibliography history study;(2)the linear evolutionary view of history has gradually become the mainstream historical view in writing the China's bibliography history;(3)the focus of writing has changed from "bibliography-centered" to "bibliography as well as bibliography maker". [Originality/Value] The article proposes an outlook for the future writing of China's bibliography history:(1)to clarify the meaning of "history of bibliography";(2)to clarify that when interpret China's bibliography history whether use the west opinions or use China's traditional opinions;(3)to clarify that the focus of China's bibliography history is the person who make the bibliographies; and(4)trying different writing styles.

Key words: China's bibliography history, Study history of China's bibliography history, History of China's library science