图书情报知识 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 67-81.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2024.04.067

• 学术聚焦(2)· 数据隐私 • 上一篇    下一篇

政府开放数据隐私风险研究:现状、特征及展望

袁静1,2 , 周欣丽1, 臧国全1,2, 张凯亮1,2   

  1. 1.郑州大学信息管理学院,郑州,450001;2.郑州市数据科学研究中心,郑州,450001 
  • 出版日期:2024-07-10 发布日期:2024-08-05
  • 通讯作者: 张凯亮(ORCID:0000-0003-0454-0525),博士,讲师,研究方向:数据隐私,Email:779015223@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:袁静(ORCID:0000-0002-9966-8662),博士,教授,研究方向:信息用户与信息服务,数据隐私与数据治理,Email:yuanwenjing82@163.com; 周欣丽(ORCID:0009-0008-6952-0078),本科生,研究方向:数据隐私与数据治理,Email:2744743778@qq.com; 臧国全(ORCID:0000-0002-9606-6455),博士,教授,研究方向:数据隐私,Email:zangguoquan@zzu.edu.cn。

Research Progress of the Open Government Data Privacy Risk: Current Status, Characteristics and Prospects

YUAN Jing1,2, ZHOU Xinli1, ZANG Guoquan1,2, ZHANG Kailiang1,2   

  1. 1. School of Information Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001; 2. Zhengzhou Data Science Research Center, Zhengzhou, 450001
  • Online:2024-07-10 Published:2024-08-05
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to ZHANG Kailiang, Email: 779015223@qq.com, ORCID:0000-0003-0454-0525

摘要: [目的/意义]系统分析国内外政府开放数据隐私风险研究成果,旨在为该领域未来研究提供启示借鉴。[研究设计/方法]采用文献调研、归纳比较、逻辑分析等方法,对国内外的研究主题、研究理论、研究方法、研究视角与情境进行分析,剖析研究不足与发展趋势。[结论/发现]现有研究主题基本涵盖风险管理的全部流程和环节,但对于风险治理实践、风险评估的可靠性、风险计量的精准性、风险治理的有效性等尚缺乏实证研究;研究视角与理论多元,但主要侧重从各自学科视角出发,研究方法多样化。未来研究需细化研究情境,开展分领域、分级、分类精细化治理,融合多学科研究方法,探讨新型治理模式的实现路径,强化治理效果与效能评价研究。[创新/价值]指出政府开放数据隐私风险治理应当从全过程视角,不仅关注隐私风险治理流程,更要开展隐私风险治理效能与效果评价,以提升政府治理实践能力。

关键词: 政府开放数据, 数据隐私, 隐私风险, 隐私治理, 隐私保护

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] The article intends to systematically review the research about privacy risk of open government data at home and abroad, aiming to provide references for future study. [Design/Methodology] Through literature research, inductive comparison, logical analysis and other methods, this article examined the research themes, research theories, research methods, research perspectives and scenarios of current study, and analyzed the research shortcomings and development trends. [Findings/Conclusion] Current research themes basically cover all processes of risk management, but there is still a lack of empirical study on practice of risk governance, the reliability of risk assessment, the accuracy of risk measurement, and the effectiveness of risk governance. The research perspectives and theories are diverse, but mainly focus on their respective disciplinary perspectives, and the research methods are diverse. Future research needs to refine the research scenarios in different fields, levels and classifications, and integrate interdisciplinary research methods, explore the implementation path of new governance models, and strengthen research on governance effectiveness evaluation. [Originality/Value] It is pointed out that open government data privacy risk governance should be approached from a full process perspective, focusing not only on the privacy risk governance process, but also on evaluating the effectiveness of privacy risk governance, in order to enhance government governance practice capabilities. 


Key words: Open government data, Data privacy, Privacy risk, Privacy governance, Privacy protection