图书情报知识 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 59-67.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2019.06.059

• 图书、文献与交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

公共文化机构参与非遗保护的职责、范畴和对象:基于法规条文的解析

陈润好   

  • 出版日期:2019-11-10 发布日期:2019-12-03

The Responsibilities, Scopes and Objects of Public Cultural Institutions in the Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage: An Analysis on the Statute

  • Online:2019-11-10 Published:2019-12-03

摘要: [目的/意义]旨在了解公共文化机构参与非遗保护的角色,明确非遗保护主体。[研究设计/方法]文章从法律条文入手,选择37份中国非物质文化遗产相关法律法规材料为分析对象,对法规中提及的公共文化机构开展非遗保护的工作职责、机构范畴、保护对象进行内容分析。[结论/发现] 公共文化机构涉足非物质文化遗产展示、传播、研究、收藏、整理和学术交流等保护工作;博物馆、图书馆、文化馆等公共文化机构承担起非遗保护的重担,更广范围的非遗保护机构框架逐渐形成;地区差异带来分类多样的非遗对象。
[创新/价值]从职能匹配、范畴限定和监管机制等角度探讨了今后公共文化机构参与非遗保护的可行路径。

关键词: 非物质文化遗产, 公共文化机构, 法规条文, 非遗保护链

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance]This paper intends to explore the role of public cultural institutions and clarify the subject of intangible cultural heritage protection. [Design/Methodology]By exploring the legal texts, 37 pieces of statutes about intangible cultural heritage in China have been selected as analytic targets, and the responsibilities, scopes, and objects of public cultural institutions in the protection of intangible cultural heritage mentioned in these statutes have been explored.[Findings/Conclusion]It has been found that public cultural institutions in China are involved in the protection of intangiblecultural heritage in several dimensions including exhibition, dissemination, research, collection, collation and academic communication; museums, libraries, and cultural centers are playing important roles in intangible cultural heritage protection, and a broader institutional framework of intangible cultural heritage protection is being formed; various classifications of objects for intangible cultural heritage protection have emerged as a result of regional disparities.[Originality/Value]The feasible approaches have been proposed for the participation of public cultural institutions in intangible cultural heritage protection in the aspects of function matching, scope and supervisory mechanism.

Keywords: Intangible cultural heritage, Public cultural institution, Statute, Intangible cultural heritage protection chain