图书情报知识 ›› 2014, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 41-52.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2014.03.041

• 博士论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

科研人员对开放获取出版的认知和行为研究述评

苏小波   

A Review of Research on Researchers’ Cognitive and Behavior in Open Access Publishing

摘要:

科研人员的认知和接受情况关乎开放获取(OA)出版的可持续发展。国内外现有研究表明:科研人员对OA出版的认知和参与情况逐渐好转;受预印本文化、学科知识发展速度等因素的影响,不同学科科研人员对OA出版的态度和接受程度、偏好选择的OA出版渠道存在明显差异;科研人员普遍认可OA出版的时效性强、传播范围广、有利于提高学术成果的影响力等优势,但科研人员对OA出版的高认同度与其实际参与情况之间存在脱节,人际影响、科研评价政策、出版费用、资源质量和版权保护等问题阻碍了人们对OA出版模式的选择和利用。现有研究中还存在缺乏针对相同样本开展的持续性跟踪调查、研究成果的措施转化不够充分、对科研人员参与OA出版的实际体验研究不足、国内开展研究的主体单一等需要进一步深化探讨的问题。

关键词: 开放获取出版, 科研人员, 认知, 行为

Abstract:

Researchers’ cognitive and acceptance of Open Access (OA) publishing is very important to its sustainable development. The current research in home and abroad showed that researchers’ cognitive and participation of OA publishing have been improving gradually. Due to the effect of preprint culture, the development speed of different disciplines and so on, there are differences among researchers from different disciplines in their attitude and acceptance of OA publishing, preferred OA publishing channel. Researchers generally recognize that OA publishing has faster publication speed, offers higher visibility, has a larger readership and impact, but researchers’ approval of OA publishing is inconsistent with their willingness to take action. The influence from colleagues and research evaluation policy, the high publishing fees,doubt about the quality control and copyright protection impede researchers’ acceptance and participation in OA publishing.There are some problems that need to be further studied in current research, including lacking ongoing survey on the same sample,insufficient use of existing research findings,paucity research on researchers’ publishing experience, the subject of domestic research is single.

Keywords: Open access publishing, Researcher, Cognitive, Behavior