图书情报知识 ›› 2016, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 22-29.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2016.05.022

• 图书、文献与交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国图书评价方法研究述评

任红娟   

A Review of the Research on the Methods of Book Evaluation in China

摘要:

本文以我国图书评价相关文献为依据,以我国图书评价研究发展历程和主要评价思想梳理为基础对其中涉及图书评价的具体指标体系以及评价模型等微观评价方法进行了总结和概括,将我国图书评价方法从图书馆馆藏图书评价方法、引文分析图书评价法、读者评论汇总法和综合图书评价法四个层面进行了微观分析方法的剖析和述评,其中图书馆馆藏图书评价方法又细分为图书使用效益评价、图书馆藏数量评价和RFM模型评价。研究结果表明:我国图书评价方法非常丰富,每种方法都有自己的优势,但是有些方法仍然采用期刊评价的套路,且方法之间的矛盾和冲突并不鲜见,以“名”为中心是一些评价指标设计的主要原则。因此,从我国图书评价的方法视角来看,更加客观、一致、完备和动态指标体系的建立是我国图书评价方法必由之路。

关键词: 图书评价, 馆藏评价, 图书使用效益, 图书引用, 读者评论, 图书影响力

Abstract:

Based on the relevant literatures of book evaluation in China, combined with the development process analysis and the main evaluation thoughts put forward by experts, the paper summarizes the concrete evaluating indices and models as four levels including library books evaluation methods, book citation analysis, readers’ reviews summary and comprehensive book evaluation methods.Among them, the evaluation method of library collection is subdivided into the evaluation of library use efficiency, the quantity evaluation of library collection and RFM model. Research results show that the book evaluation methods are very rich, each method has its own advantage. However,there are still evaluation methods which refer to journal evaluation.Meanwhile, the contraction and conflict among these methods are not rare,the designing principle of some evaluation indicators mainly depends on the fame.Therefore,more objective,uniform,thorough and dynamic evaluation indicator systems are necessary.

Keywords: Book evaluation;Collection evaluation;Usage effect of books;Book citation;Readers&rsquo, review;Book impact