图书情报知识 ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 113-121.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2017.04.113

• 知识、学习与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于科研人员需求的个人知识管理工具竞争力分析及新构想

张义民,韩文,刘畅,华丹   

  • 出版日期:2017-07-10 发布日期:2017-07-10

Competitiveness Analysis and Innovation on Personal Knowledge Management Tools Based on Researchers’ Demands

  • Online:2017-07-10 Published:2017-07-10

摘要:

在知识爆炸式增长的知识经济时代,对于与知识互动密切的科研人员来说,利用知识管理工具把碎片化的知识高效地组织起来,将有利于提高知识的利用率和科研成果产出率。为了辅助科研人员选择更适合的知识管理工具,本文选取了八款常见的知识管理工具,对其在科研领域的相对竞争力进行了量化分析。本文首先通过用户访谈和问卷调查的方法,调研了科研人员对个人知识管理工具的需求点,并建立了需求的KANO模型;然后结合KANO模型的需求重要度,提出了KANOCA量化分析法,计算出了八款个人知识管理工具的相对竞争力指数及其排名;最后通过分析这八款知识管理工具的优势和劣势,并结合科研人员需求,提出了集知识收集、知识存储、知识组织、知识使用和知识交流于一体的一站式知识管理工具的新构想。

关键词: 个人知识管理, 科研人员需求, KANO需求模型, 知识管理工具, 相对竞争力, 一站式知识管理

Abstract:

In the age of knowledge economics, the explosive growth of knowledge makes knowledge management becoming more and more difficult, especially for researchers. So helping researchers organize knowledge pieces by using PKM software can improve scientific productivity and knowledge utilization. In order to assist researchers choosing suitable PKM tools, this paper quantitatively analyze eight PKM tools and calculate their competitiveness index in research field. Firstly, we use user interview and questionnaire to gather researchers’ demand of PKM and build the KANO demand model. After that, we conduct KANOCA method which consider user demand importance of KANO model to calculate the index and rank of relative competitiveness.At last,based on analyzing strength and weakness of these PKM tools, we propose a new idea which set knowledge collecting, storage, organization, utilization and sharing in a unit to better assist researchers managing knowledge.

Key words: Personal knowledge management;Researchers demand, KANO demand model;PKM software;Relative competitive power;One-stop knowledge management