图书情报知识 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 105-116.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2023.02.105

• 图书、文献与交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

同行评议有效吗——基于有效市场假说的探究

张光耀 1, 2, 邵文君 3, 谢维熙 1, 姜春林 1, 王贤文 1   

  1. 1.大连理工大学科学学与科技管理研究所暨WISE实验室,大连,116024;
    2. 荷兰马斯特里赫特科技创新经济研究院(UNU-MERIT),马斯特里赫特,6211AX;
    3.南京大学社会学院,南京,210046
  • 出版日期:2023-03-10 发布日期:2023-05-09
  • 通讯作者: 王贤文(ORCID:0000-0002-7236-9267),博士,教授,研究方向:科学计量学,Email: xianwenwaxi@dlut.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:张光耀(ORCID:0000-0002-0505-1160),博士研究生,研究方向:科学学,Email:sdgyzhang@163.com;邵文君(ORCID:0000-0003-4986-0872),博士研究生,研究方向:社会学,Email:15051867142@163.com;谢维熙(ORCID:0000-0003-2330-7980),博士研究生,研究方向:科学计量学,Email:wrsjcycdfdsnt@163.com;姜春林(ORCID:0000-0002-6565-4166),教授,研究方向:学术评价,Email:chunlinj7873@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家自然科学基金面上项目“科学文献全景大数据下的研究热点及研究前沿探测”(71974029)的研究成果之一。

Is Peer Review Effective?An Exploration Based on Efficient Market Hypothesis

ZHANG Guangyao, SHAO Wenjun, XIE Weixi, JIANG Chunlin, WANG Xianwen   

  • Online:2023-03-10 Published:2023-05-09
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to WANG Xianwen, Email: xianwenwaxi@dlut.edu.cn,ORCID: 0000-0002-7236-9267
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the project "Detecting Real-time Hot Topics and Research Fronts With Scholarly Big Data"(71974029)supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China.

摘要: [ 目的 / 意义 ] 同行评议在科学发展中扮演着关键角色,探讨同行评议的有效性对同行评议制度的发展和运行有着重要意义。[ 研究设计 / 方法 ] 旨在对两种不同的研究取向进行回顾与阐述:即同行评议何以有效与为何无效。并从尚未得到充分关注的同行评议与文献计量间的内在联系这一视角切入,借鉴有效市场假说,从更加系统性的维度重新架构同行评议有效性的评判路径。[结论/发现]同行评议的有效性是同行评议功能得以发挥的基准,而引文量作为最核心的文献计量指标与同行评议结果之间存在紧密且复杂的内在联系,并在此基础上提出了以三种同行评议有效性形式(弱有效、半强有效、强有效)为主的有效同行评议假说。[ 创新 / 价值 ] 从更为多元和异质性的视角,提出了新的关于同行评议有效性的解释路径,在一定程度上呈现了同行评议机制的内在复杂性,搭建了同行评议与文献计量指标之间的内在联系。

关键词: 同行评议, 文献计量, 默顿规范, 有效同行评议, 科学学

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Peer review plays a key role in scientific development. It is important to explore the effectiveness of peer review for the development and operation of the peer review system. [Design/Methodology] This research aims to review and expound why peer review is effective and why it is ineffective, the two completely different research orientations. So, from the perspective of the internal relationship between peer review and bibliometrics, by introducing the efficient market hypothesis ,which is put forward by Eugene F. Fama, winner of Nobel Prize in Economics,a evaluation path of the effectiveness of peer review from a more systematic dimension is reconstructed. [Findings/Conclusion] Holding that the effectiveness of peer review is the benchmark for the exertion of peer review function and there is a close and complex internal relationship between citation quantity, the core document measurement index and peer review results, this study puts forward an effective peer review hypothesis based on three effective forms of peer review(weak-form,semistrong-form and strong-form). [Originality/Value] This study puts forward a brand-new explanation path on the effectiveness of peer review from a more diverse and heterogeneous perspective, which presents the inherent complexity of the peer review mechanism to a certain extent, and establishes an internal relationship between peer review and literature measurement indicators.

Key words: Peer review, Bibliometrics, Merton's norms, Efficient peer review, Science of science