图书情报知识 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 15-26.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2024.03.015

• 二十大精神研究阐释与践行·人工智能素养教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

人工智能素养教育:全球进展与展望

张静蓓1,2 ,虞晨琳1,2 ,蔡迎春1,2   

  1. 1.上海外国语大学图书馆,上海,201620;
    2.上海外国语大学数字学术中心,上海,201620
  • 出版日期:2024-05-10 发布日期:2024-07-04
  • 通讯作者: 虞晨琳(ORCID:0000-0002-7925-6548),硕士,馆员,研究方向:信息行为、数字素养教育,Email:yuchenlin@shisu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:张静蓓(ORCID:0000-0002-2439-5049),硕士,馆员,研究方向:数字素养教育,Email:zhangjingbei@foxmail.com;蔡迎春(ORCID:0000-0002-7736-2267),博士,研究馆员,研究方向:数字人文、数字素养教育,Email:cyingc@shisu.edu.cn。

Artificial Intelligence Literacy Education: Global Progress and Prospects

ZHANG Jingbei1,2 YU Chenlin1,2 CAI Yingchun1,2   

  1. 1. Shanghai International Studies University Library, Shanghai, 201620;
    2. Digital Scholarship Center of Shanghai International Studies University,Shanghai, 201620
  • Online:2024-05-10 Published:2024-07-04
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to YU Chenlin, Email:yuchenlin@shisu.edu.cn, ORCID:0000-0002-7925-6548

摘要: [目的/意义]探讨和总结AI素养教育的全球发展现状与趋势,明晰高校开展AI素养教育的现状和不足并以此提供优化策略。[研究设计/方法]以国际组织、发达国家等发布的政策文件、会议记录、研究论文等各种研究资料为基础探索AI素养教育的发展趋势,以采莓模式分析国内外29所高校在AI素养教育实践中的创新举措。[结论/发现] AI素养教育与AI教育存在明显的界限与联系。国际政策导向在推动AI素养教育方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但目前AI素养教育框架缺失。高校开展AI素养教育实践的施教者主要是学院、学习发展中心和图书馆,开展形式多样,教育内容涉及知识、技能、态度伦理价值观等方面。高校开展AI素养教育需要制定与优化教育框架、发挥高校图书馆的关键作用、实施多元化教育策略并基于KSAVE充实教育内容。[创新/价值]洞察AI素养教育的国际发展趋势,剖析高校AI素养教育的创新实践并以此提出优化策略,为高校AI素养教育领域的推广与实施提供有益的借鉴和指导。

关键词: 人工智能素养, 人工智能素养教育, 高校素养教育

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This paper aims to investigate and summarize the current status and trends of global AI literacy education for clarifying the present situation and deficiencies and propose strategies for optimizing the AI literacy education in universities. [Design/Methodology] The study explores the developmental trends of AI literacy education based on various research materials such as policy documents, conference records, and research papers released by international organizations and developed countries. It employs the Berry-picking model to analyze innovative initiatives in AI literacy education practices at 29 universities both domestically and internationally. [Findings/Conclusion] A clear boundary and interconnection exist between AI literacy education and AI education. The orientation of international policies plays a crucial role in promoting AI literacy education, yet there is a lack of a comprehensive framework for such education. In universities, the primary AI literacy education educators consist of colleges, learning development centers and libraries, with diverse forms to deliver educational content encompassing knowledge, skills, attitudes, and ethical values. To effectively conduct AI literacy education at universities, it is imperative to establish and optimize an educational framework, while leverage the key role of university libraries. This can be achieved through the implementation of diversified educational strategies, and the enrichment of educational content based on the KSAVE model. [Originality/Value] Based on the findings by providing insights into the international development trends of AI literacy education and analyzing current innovative practices implemented in universities, this paper proposes strategies for optimization AI literacy education, which provides valuable references and guidance for the promotion and implementation of AI literacy education in universities.

Keywords: AI literacy, AI literacy education, University literacy education