图书情报知识 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 145-155.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2025.02.145

• 情报、信息与共享 • 上一篇    下一篇

社交网络圈群极化: 不同类型意见领袖的异质性分析

张媛媛1, 王鑫磊1, 杨永清1, 吴江2   

  1. 1.山东工商学院管理科学与工程学院,烟台,264005;
    2.武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉,430072
  • 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-05-03
  • 通讯作者: 杨永清(ORCID: 0000-0002-5833-9619),博士,教授,研究方向为大数据与舆情分析,Email: Yangyq@sdtbu.edu.cn.
  • 作者简介:张媛媛(ORCID: 0009-0002-3927-0676),博士,副教授,研究方向:大数据分析与应用,Email:frank_zyy@126.com;王鑫磊(ORCID: 0000-0002-2712-6282),硕士研究生,研究方向:大数据与用户信息行为,Email: wxl_199710@163.com;吴江(ORCID: 0000-0002-3342-9757),博士,教授,研究方向:社会网络计算、社会仿真模拟,Email: jiangw@whu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金项目“网络圈群社交行为形成机理及舆情治理机制研究”(20BSH151)和山东省高等学校青创科技支持计划“大数据与决策分析创新团队” (2020RWG007)的研究成果之一。

The Polarization of Network Circles in Social Media: A Heterogeneity Analysis on Different Types of Opinion Leaders

ZHANG Yuanyuan1, WANG Xinlei1, YANG Yongqing1, WU Jiang2   

  1. 1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai, 264005;
    2. School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072
  • Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-05-03
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to YANG Yongqing, Email: Yangyq@sdtbu.edu.cn, ORCID: 0000-0002-5833-9619
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the project "Research on the Formation Mechanism of Social Behavior and Public Opinion Governance Mechanism of Network Circles"(20BSH151)supported by National Social Science Foundation of China, and the project "Innovative Team of Big Data and Decision Analytics"(2020RWG007)supported by a grant from Youth Creative Science and Technology Supporting Program of Shandong Province Higher Education Institutes.

摘要: [目的/意义]从社交网络圈群极化的角度,探索不同类型意见领袖网络圈群的异质性,为舆情治理部门针对群体极化现象采取圈群差异化治理策略提供理论参考及决策支持。[研究设计/方法]以微博平台为例,获取舆情事件数据,采用多元回归模型分析不同圈群意见领袖与圈群舆论极化、群体极化之间的关系。[结论/发现]在圈群舆论极化方面,当意见领袖为个人用户时,圈群用户与意见领袖情感态度的差异程度对圈群舆论极化程度具有显著的负向影响;当意见领袖为官方机构用户时,圈群用户与意见领袖情感态度的差异程度对圈群舆论极化程度具有显著的正向影响。在圈群群体极化方面,圈群中的讨论次数对群体极化程度具有显著的负向影响,意见领袖认证类型和情感强度对这种影响具显著的调节作用,而圈群意见领袖影响力对其不具有显著的调节作用。圈群意见领袖为官方机构用户时较个人用户会增强两者间的影响关系,圈群意见领袖情感增强时会减弱两者间的影响关系。[创新/价值]引入意见领袖类型作为调节变量,探究了各类意见领袖对圈群群体极化程度的影响差异,拓展了群体极化影响机制的相关研究,提供了基于网络圈群研究群体极化的新思路。

关键词: 社交网络舆情, 网络圈群, 舆论极化, 群体极化, 意见领袖

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] From the perspective of social network circles group polarization, this paper explores the heterogeneity of network circle groups led by different types of opinion leaders, aiming to provide theoretical references and decision support for public opinion management departments in implementing diverse governance strategies to address the phenomenon of group polarization.[Design/Methodology] Taking Weibo platform as an example, this study obtained the data of public opinion events, and used multiple regression models to analyze the relationship between opinion leaders in different network circles and the polarization of public opinion and group polarization of the network circles. [Findings/Conclusion] In terms of group opinion polarization, if the opinion leader is an individual user, the degree of difference between the emotional attitude of group users and the opinion leader significantly impacts the degree of group opinion polarization negatively. Conversely, when official organization users act as opinion leaders, the degree of difference between the emotional attitude of network group users and the opinion leader has a significant positive effect on the polarization degree of network circle opinion. Regarding group polarization, the number of discussions in the group has a notable negative influence on its level of polarization. Additionally, both the authentication type and sentiment strength of opinion leaders significantly moderate this effect; however their influence has no significant moderating effect. Compared with individual users, group opinion leaders who are official users will enhance the influence relationship between the number of discussions in the circle group and the degree of group polarization, and the influence relationship between them will be weakened when the feelings of the group opinion leaders are enhanced. [Originality/Value] This study introduces the type of opinion leader as a moderating variable, explores the differences in the influence of various types of opinion leaders on the degree of group polarization of network circles, expands the relevant research on the influence mechanism of group polarization, and provides a new idea for the study of group polarization based on social network circles.

Keywords: Social network public opinion, Social network circles, Opinion polarization, Group polarization, Opinion leaders