图书情报知识 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 6-18, 65.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2025.05.006

• 专题(1)·可信数据空间 • 上一篇    下一篇

流动的丰盈:面向可信数据空间建设的理论观照与实践观察

胡峰1,2   

  1. 1.江苏省科学技术情报研究所,南京,210042;
    2.江苏省科学技术发展战略研究院,南京,210042
  • 出版日期:2025-09-10 发布日期:2025-11-13
  • 通讯作者: 胡峰(ORCID: 0000-0002-7848-2279),博士,研究员,研究方向:数据治理、安全信息、应急情报等,Email: hd3024985211@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金一般项目“科技自立自强创新情报支撑体系研究”(22BTQ065)的研究成果之一。

Flowing Abundance: Theoretical Reflection and Practical Observation on Trusted Data Space Construction

HU Feng1,2   

  1. 1. Jiangsu Information Institute of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210042;
    2. Jiangsu Academy of Science and Technology for Development, Nanjing, 210042
  • Online:2025-09-10 Published:2025-11-13
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to HU Feng, Email: hd3024985211@126.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-7848-2279
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the project "Research on the Innovation Information Support System for Self- Reliance in S&T"(22BTQ065)supported by National Social Science Foundation of China.

摘要: [目的/意义]可信数据空间构建了一种“数据不动价值动”的新型流通范式,对于促进数据合规流通、释放数据要素价值具有战略意义。[研究设计/方法]基于“概念切入点—功能投射点—现实立足点—案例聚焦点”的研究思路,对可信数据空间进行理论与实践相结合的系统分析。理论观照上,从内涵与属性两方面界定可信数据空间,并论述空间建设的应然意义和实然效用。实践观察上,先从区域和领域两个层面,对可信数据空间建设进行全景刻画;在此基础上,聚集欧洲健康数据空间(EHDS)和温州健康数据空间(WHDS)两个案例,从要素、保障、功能三方面对其建设机制进行解构。[结论/发现]通过共识规则、多方主体、数据资源、关键技术、应用场景的耦合关联,并基于共享、控制、治理、透明和互操作属性,可信数据空间不仅可纾解数据流通困境、应对数据安全风险,也能推动单一数字市场发展、赋能社会数字治理。国内外通过“法治+技治”的方式,有序推进多领域的可信数据空间布局与发展。EHDS和WHDS通过多元要素的协同参与、制度和技术的双重保障、数据权益调适的主要功能,释放健康数据共同体的价值红利。[创新/价值]在丰富可信数据空间学理研究面向的同时,为可信数据空间高质量发展和赋能数字经济建设提供决策支持。

关键词: 可信数据空间, 数据流通, 数据价值

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Trusted data spaces have built a novel circulation paradigm of data characterized by "data remaining stationary while value flows", which is of strategic significance for promoting the compliant circulation of data and releasing the value of data elements. [Design/Methodology] Based on the research idea of "conceptual entry point-functional projection point-realistic foothold-case focus point", this paper conducts a systematic analysis of trusted data spaces by integrating theory and practice. In terms of theoretical reflection perspective, it defines trusted data spaces from connotation and attribute, and explores the ought-to-be significance and actual utility of constructing such a space. In terms of practical observation perspective, it first provides a panoramic depiction of the construction of trusted data spaces from region and field; on this basis, two cases, the European Health Data Space(EHDS)and the Wenzhou Health Data Space(WHDS), are focused to deconstruct the construction mechanism from the three aspects of elements, guarantees and functions. [Findings/Conclusion] Through the coupling association of consensus rules, multiple stakeholders, data resources, key technologies, and application scenario, and leveraging the attributes of sharing, control, governance, transparency, and interoperability, trusted data spaces can not only alleviate the difficulties in data circulation and deal with data security risks, but also promote the development of a single digital market while empowering social digital governance. Through the the approach of "rule of law + technology governance", the layout and development of trusted data spaces are being promoted in an orderly manner across multiple fields at home and abroad. EHDS and WHDS release the value dividends of the health data community through multi-element collaboration, dual-systematic and technological safeguards,and by primarily addressing the adjustment of data rights and interests. [Originality/Value] While enriching the theoretical research of trusted data spaces, this study provides decision-making support for the high-quality development of trusted data spaces and empowering the construction of the digital economy.

Keywords: Trusted data spaces, Data circulation, Data value