图书情报知识 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 88-97,123.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2026.01.088

• 图书、文献与交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

数智时代的学者画像研究:问题与进路

王心玥, 赵丹群   

  1. 北京大学信息管理系,北京,100871
  • 出版日期:2026-01-10 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 赵丹群(ORCID: 0000-0003-0685-6689),博士,教授,研究方向:科学计量学、引文分析与学术评价、信息检索与信息组织等,Email: zdq@pku.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:王心玥(ORCID: 0009-0001-0257-8610),博士研究生,研究方向:科学计量学,Email: 2201111136@stu.pku.edu.cn。

Researcher Profile in the Age of Digital Intelligence: Problems and Approaches

WANG Xinyue, ZHAO Danqun   

  1. Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing, 100871
  • Online:2026-01-10 Published:2026-03-24
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to ZHAO Danqun, Email: zdq@pku.edu.cn, ORCID: 0000-0003-0685-6689

摘要: [目的/意义]学者画像主要通过多源数据获取,从中识别并提取恰当的标签来概括科研人员的多维度特征。本文旨在厘清该选题研究现状,探明数智时代的研究进取方向,更好服务于文献检索、科研合作推荐以及学术评价等诸多应用问题的有效解决。[研究设计/方法]通过全面的文献调研和梳理分析,对当前国内外学者画像研究进展及存在问题进行归纳总结,并就未来研究进路给出相应的对策建议。[结论/发现]当前学者画像已取得显著研究进展和若干研究共识,但在占主导地位的实证与应用类研究中,主要存在画像数据利用不充分、画像维度缺失、画像内容缺乏共识与规范、画像技术较少创新等突出问题。未来应强化画像理论研究,拓展计量学画像视角,积极关注学术人格画像,有效利用AIGC类工具,以不断提升学者画像研究的理论化、精准化和智能化水平。[创新/价值]对学者画像研究进展进行系统性梳理,并直面数智时代的新问题与新挑战,提出有针对性的研究建议。

关键词: 学者画像, 用户画像, 学术画像, 学术人格, 数智时代

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Researcher profiling primarily involves collecting data from multiple sources to extract and add appropriate labels to outline the multidimensional characteristics of targeted researchers. This paper aims to clarify the current status of this research field, explore its directions of research in the digital intelligence era, and better serve the effective solution of many application problems such as literature retrieval, cooperator recommendation and academic evaluation, etc. [Design/Methodology] Based on comprehensive literature review, we summarize its research progress and existing problems in the field of researcher profile at home and abroad, and then give corresponding countermeasures and suggestions for its future development. [Findings/Conclusion] Though significant research progress and several research consensus points have been achieved in the field of researcher profile, some prominent issues still remain in the dominant empirical and applied studies, such as insufficient utilization of profiling data, incomplete profiling dimensions, absence of agreements regarding profiling content, and limited innovation in profiling methodologies, etc. Future efforts should focus on strengthening its theoretical construction, expanding or deepening its perspective of bibliometrics especially by Citation Content Analysis(CCA), paying more attention to some topics related to academic personality, and effectively using emerging AIGC-type tools to continuously enhance the theorization, precision, and intelligence of researcher profile research. [Originality/Value] Facing up to future research needs and new challenges in the age of digital intelligence, a systematic overview and some valuable suggestions are given in this study.

Keywords: Researcher profile, User profile, Academic profile, Academic personality, Digital intelligence era