图书情报知识 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 104-114.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2026.04.104

• 图书、文献与交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

走向学科自觉的中国目录学研究——基于第一至八届全国目录学学术研讨会的述评

刘旭青1, 阴文晴2, 仇琳1   

  1. 1.河北大学管理学院,保定,071002;
    2.南京大学信息管理学院,南京,210023
  • 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-10-06
  • 通讯作者: 刘旭青(ORCID: 0000-0002-8868-7358),博士,副教授,研究方向:文献目录学、古籍保护,Email: hbuliuxuqing@163.com。
  • 作者简介:阴文晴(ORCID: 0009-0004-6334-1512),博士研究生,研究方向:文献目录学、古籍保护,Email: hbuyinwenqing@163.com;仇琳(ORCID: 0009-0001-3460-7500),硕士研究生,研究方向:文献学、阅读推广,Email: alin0324@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目“近代以来导读书目理论与导读书目编制研究”(24CTQ066)的研究成果之一。

Towards Discipline Self-Awareness in Chinese Bibliography Research: A Review Based on the First to Eighth National Bibliography Symposium

LIU Xuqing1, YIN Wenqing2, QIU Lin1   

  1. 1. School of Management, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002;
    2. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023
  • Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-10-06
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to LIU Xuqing, Email: hbuliuxuqing@163.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-8868-7358
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the Youth Project "Research on the Theory and Compilation of Guided Reading Lists Since Modern Times"(24CTQ066)supported by National Social Science Foundation of China.

摘要: [目的/意义]全国目录学学术研讨会自1983年创办以来,成功举办了八届,已成为推动中国目录学学科建设与学术交流的重要平台。整体回顾历届研讨会的发展历程有助于为当代目录学发展提供历史镜鉴与路径参考。[研究设计/方法]以学术史方法系统梳理了历届研讨会的核心议题与代表性观点,进而厘清不同时代背景下中国目录学研究的焦点变迁与演进脉络。[结论/发现]从历届研讨会历程回顾与学术传统延续、建设中国特色的目录学学科体系、学术共同体对学科发展的支撑、中国目录学的守正创新四个维度展开论述,勾勒出中国目录学如何借助学术研讨会机制走向“学科自觉”的过程。[创新/价值]将八届研讨会作为连续的学术史事件集进行整体回顾和梳理,揭示其作为学科发展核心引擎的内在机制,对构建中国特色目录学学科体系具有参考价值。

关键词: 目录学, 学术研讨会, 学科自觉, 中国特色

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Since its inception in 1983, the National Bibliography Symposium has been successfully held eight times, becoming an important platform for promoting construction of the discipline and facilitating academic exchange of Chinese bibliography. Reviewing the development history of previous symposia as a whole helps provide historical insights and path references for the contemporary development of bibliography studies. [Design/Methodology] This paper systematically examines the core topics and representative viewpoints of previous symposia using an academic history method, thereby clarifying the shifts in focus and the evolution trajectory of Chinese bibliography research across different historical backgrounds. [Findings/Conclusion] The discussion is conducted from four dimensions: reviewing the historical process of previous symposia and the continuation of academic traditions, building a bibliography discipline system with Chinese characteristics, the role of the academic community in supporting discipline development, and the adherence to principles and innovation in Chinese bibliography, clearly outlining the process of how Chinese bibliography has moved towards "disciplinary self-awareness" through the mechanism of academic symposia. [Originality/Value] This paper is the first to provide a comprehensive review and analysis of the eight symposia as a continuous sequence of academic history events, revealing the inherent mechanism of symposia served as a core engine of discipline development; this offers valuable references for constructing a bibliography discipline system with Chinese characteristics.

Keywords: Bibliography, Academic symposium, Disciplinary self-awareness, Chinese characteristics