图书情报知识 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 127-138.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2026.04.127

• 知识、学习与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

面向多元场景的数据治理政策与理论协同度研究

王焘1,2, 路玉婷3, 石亦瑶2, 付少雄4   

  1. 1.南京大学数据智能与交叉创新实验室,南京,210023;
    2.南京大学信息管理学院,南京,210023;
    3.南京大学政府管理学院,南京,210023;
    4.南京农业大学信息管理学院,南京,210023
  • 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-10-06
  • 通讯作者: 路玉婷(ORCID: 0009-0008-5481-2748),博士研究生,研究方向:数据治理,Email: lyting1130@163.com。
  • 作者简介:王焘(ORCID: 0009-0002-5101-2442),博士研究生,研究方向:数据治理、科技情报,Email: ttwang@smail.nju.edu.cn;石亦瑶(ORCID: 0009-0002-4535-4227),本科生,研究方向:数据治理,Email: 221820031@smail.nju.edu.cn;付少雄(ORCID: 0000-0002-5166-3141),博士,副教授,研究方向:用户行为与信息服务、数据治理,Email: fu_shaoxiong@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“前沿交叉领域识别与融合创新路径预测方法研究”(23&ZD225)的研究成果之一。

The Synergies Between Policy and Theory in Data Governance Oriented to Multiple Scenarios

WANG Tao1,2, LU Yuting3, SHI Yiyao2, FU Shaoxiong4   

  1. 1. Laboratory of Data Intelligence and Interdisciplinary Innovation of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023;
    2.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023;
    3.School of Government Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023;
    4.School of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210023
  • Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-10-06
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to LU Yuting, Email: lyting1130@163.com, ORCID: 0009-0008-5481-2748
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the Major Project "Research on Methods for Identifying Cutting-edge Interdisciplinary Fields and Predicting Paths for Integrated Innovation"(23&ZD225)supported by National Social Science Foundation of China.

摘要: [目的/意义]数据治理正在成为推动数据要素价值释放的重要工程。探究面向多元场景的数据治理政策实践与理论研究的协同度,有助于缩小政策与理论协同差异,以推动数据治理效果提升。[研究设计/方法]从“政策—理论”协同视角出发,引入社会技术系统理论,采用元人种志和DEMATEL方法识别面向多元场景的数据治理研究中的关键要素,并以其为节点对相关政策文本进行质性分析,基于政策与理论的关注焦点差异计算协同度,并从政策工具类型和时间阶段演化维度进行协同度分析。[结论/发现]数据治理需求、数据治理规划、数据基础设施等为相关理论研究的9个核心关注点;在协同度方面,从政策工具类型看,技术与人员供给型工具需持续关注,需求型与环境型工具应用有限且结构有待优化;从时间阶段演化看,整体呈现协同推进态势,理论研究相较于政策实践的滞后性随时间推移逐步减弱,但这一趋势主要体现在早期理论关注度相对不足的要素上。[创新/价值]丰富了社会技术系统理论以及数据治理政策与理论协同的研究范畴,为更好提出面向多元场景的政策与理论协同优化策略提供一定启示。

关键词: 数据治理, 多元场景, 社会技术系统理论, 政策与理论协同

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Data governance is emerging as a critical initiative for unlocking the value of data as an economic factor. Exploring the synergies between policy practice and theoretical research in data governance oriented to multiple scenarios can help bridge the gaps in policy and theory synergy, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of data governance. [Design/Methodology] From the perspective of "policy-theory" synergy, this study introduces the social-technical system theory and employs meta-ethnography along with DEMATEL methods to identify the key elements in multiple scenario-oriented data governance research. It takes these elements as nodes to conduct qualitative analysis on relevant policy texts, calculates the synergies by assessing the divergence between policy focus and theoretical research, and conducts synergies analysis from the perspectives of policy instrument types and temporal evolution stages. [Findings/Conclusion] Related theoretical research highlights nine core areas of concern, including data governance requirements, data governance planning, and data infrastructure, etc. Regarding synergy, from the perspective of policy instrument types, technological and personnel supply-type tools require sustained attention, whereas demand-type and environmental-type tools are underutilized and their structure needs to be optimized. From the perspective of the evolution of time stages, an overall trend of increasing synergy is observed, with the lag of theoretical research behind policy practice gradually diminishing over time, but this trend is primarily observed in elements received relatively limited theoretical attention in the early stages. [Originality/Value] This study enriches the theoretical framework of Sociotechnical System Theory and expands the research scope of synergies between policy and theory in data governance, offering valuable insights for developing optimized strategies for multiple scenario-oriented policy and theory synergy.

Keywords: Data governance, Multiple scenarios, Sociotechnical System Theory, Policy and theory synergy