图书情报知识 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 72-83.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2026.02.072

• 专题·重新认识Altmetrics • 上一篇    下一篇

社交媒体情境下科研成果的公众态度研究——以微博为例

刘晓娟, 项楠楠   

  1. 北京师范大学政府管理学院,北京,100875
  • 出版日期:2026-03-10 发布日期:2026-05-21
  • 通讯作者: 刘晓娟(ORCID: 0000-0002-5727-733X),博士,教授,研究方向:信息计量与科学评价,Email: lxj_2007@bnu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:项楠楠(ORCID: 0000-0002-2339-6584),硕士研究生,研究方向:信息计量与分析,Email: 202421260046@mail.bnu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金项目“公众信任视角下科研成果社会影响的分析与评价研究”(23BTQ058)的研究成果之一。

Public Attitude Towards Scientific Research Achievements in the Context of Social Media: A Case Study of Weibo

LIU Xiaojuan, XIANG Nannan   

  1. School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875
  • Online:2026-03-10 Published:2026-05-21
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to LIU Xiaojuan, Email: lxj_2007@bnu.edu.cn, ORCID: 0000-0002-5727-733X
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the project "Research on the Analysis and Evaluation of the Social Impact of Scientific Research Achievements from the Perspective of Public Trust"(23BTQ058)supported by National Social Science Foundation of China.

摘要: [目的/意义]随着科研成果在社交媒体上的传播,它们逐渐被公众所关注和讨论,探究公众对社交媒体中传播的科研成果所持的态度,探寻加强科学传播、提升公众科学素养的有效途径,有助于提高科研成果的社会影响力。[研究设计/方法]根据科研成果博文的点赞数、转发数、评论内容的情感倾向计算科研成果的公众态度,构建科研成果的公众态度模型,从科研成果、博文、公众三方面分析公众态度的差异。[结论/发现]使用微博数据进行实证分析发现:社交媒体中的科研成果,尤其是那些受到广泛传播的成果,获得的公众评价往往伴随着更多的负面和质疑声音。科研成果的传播力与公众态度的积极性呈微弱负相关关系;公众对应用科学类成果持更积极的态度;声明权威来源、点明背景意义、提及身份信息、内容准确客观、呈现形式丰富的科研成果博文更能获得公众的正面反馈;公众的认知和经验在很大程度上影响其态度;线索数量过多或过少都会削弱公众的信任和支持。[创新/价值]揭示公众对不同类型、不同传播形式的科研成果态度的差异,总结赢得公众积极态度的成果内容及传播特征,可以为提升公众科学素养、科学传播和科研成果的社会影响力提供参考。

关键词: 社交媒体, 公众态度, 科学传播, 社会影响力, 科研成果评价

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] As scientific research achievements are disseminated on social media, they gradually attract public attention and discussion. Exploring public attitude towards scientific research achievements disseminated through social media, and seeking effective ways to strengthen scientific communication and enhance public scientific literacy, are crucial for improving the social impact of scientific research achievements. [Design/Methodology] The Public attitude towards scientific research achievements are calculated based on the number of likes, share, and the sentiment tendencies of comments on the posts related to these achievements. A public attitude model for scientific research achievements is constructed, and the differences in public attitude are analyzed from three aspects: scientific research achievements, blog posts, and the public. [Findings/Conclusion] An empirical analysis using Weibo data reveals that scientific research achievements on social media, especially those that receive widespread dissemination, often receive more negative and skeptical evaluations from the public. There is a weak negative correlation between the level of dissemination power of achievements and the positivity of public attitude; the public holds more positive attitudes towards applied scientific research achievements; the posts that clearly indicate authoritative sources, clarify background significance, mention identity information, have accurate and objective content, and present in a rich form are more likely to receive positive feedback from the public; public cognition and experience significantly influence their attitudes; and excessive or insufficient cues will weaken public trust and support. [Originality/Value] This study reveals differences in public attitude towards the scientific research achievements with different types and dissemination forms, and summarizes the content and dissemination characteristics of those research achievements that elicit positive public attitude. It provides references for enhancing public scientific literacy, scientific communication, and the social impact of scientific research achievements.

Keywords: Social media, Public attitude, Science communication, Social impact, Achievements evaluation