图书情报知识 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 6-17,28.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2025.01.006

• 二十大精神研究阐释与践行·提升学术研究的政策影响力 • 上一篇    下一篇

哪些研究更易产生政策影响——以学术论文分类与多维特征分析为路径

曹喆1,2 ,尚媛媛3 ,张琳1,2   

  1. 1.武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉,430072;
    2.武汉大学科教管理与评价中心,武汉,430072;
    3.中国社会科学评价研究院,北京,100732
  • 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 张琳(ORCID: 0000-0003-0526-9677),博士,教授,研究方向:科学计量与科教政策评价,Email: linzhang1117@whu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:曹喆(ORCID: 0000-0002-9379-2013),博士研究生,研究方向:科学计量与科教政策评价,Email: caozhe@whu.edu.cn;尚媛媛(ORCID: 0000-0003-4219-2541),博士,助理研究员,研究方向:科学计量与科教政策评价,Email: shangafra@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家自然科学基金面上项目“从测度到理解:跨学科研究的成果分类、合作模式与影响扩散研究”(72374160)和中国科协研究生科普能力提升项目“科研成果社会传播的路径分析与策略研究”(KXYJS2024016)的研究成果之一。

What Kinds of Research Are More Likely to Generate Policy Impact: Taking Classification and Multidimensional Characteristics of Academic Articles as Pathways

CAO Zhe1,2 , SHANG Yuanyuan3 ,ZHANG Lin1,2   

  1. 1. School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072;
    2. Center for Science, Technology & Education Assessment, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072;
    3. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Evaluation Studies, Beijing, 100732
  • Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-03-19
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to ZHANG Lin, Email: linzhang1117@whu.edu.cn, ORCID: 0000-0003-0526-9677
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the project "From Indicators to Indicating: Outcome Classification, Collaboration Patterns, and Impact Diffusion of Interdisciplinary Research"(72374160)supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the Graduate Program for Enhancing Popular Science Capabilities "Pathways and Strategies for Social Dissemination of Scientific Research Outcomes"(KXYJS2024016)supported by China Association for Science and Technology.

摘要: [目的/意义]支撑政策制定是科研成果社会价值的重要反映之一,但科研成果政策影响的复杂成因尚不明朗。聚焦政策影响产生的源头,探究不同类型学术论文产生政策影响的特征,相关结果能为科研管理者更好地理解和评估科研成果的社会价值提供实证依据。[研究设计/方法]从是否以政策为导向的研究动机和提供支撑性或引导性信息的研究内容两个维度出发,构建政策影响视角下学术论文分类的理论模型,基于论文摘要设计类型划分的具体实现路径。以生物医学领域研究为例开展实证研究,围绕“政策影响扩散→多元影响比较→研究主体回溯”分析思路,设计多维测度指标,揭示不同类型论文的特征异同。[结论/发现]在有政策引用的论文中,以政策为导向的行动建议型和决策支持型论文较多;而在高政策引用的论文中,提供支撑性信息的信息提供型和决策支持型论文较多。四类论文被政策引用的即时性与持续性,施引机构和国家的多样性,均呈现出差异化特征;四类论文在不同场景中,特别是在网络传播和政策支撑两个场域之间,具有相对一致的影响力水平;从主体视角回溯政策影响的成因,发现国际合作有助于促进政策影响的产生,而不同国家产出的四类论文及其政策影响特征各具特色。[创新/价值]构建政策影响视角下学术论文的分类模型和实现路径,为剖析和理解学术论文的政策影响提供新的理论框架与方法指导。

关键词: 政策影响, 论文分类, 研究动机, 研究内容, 科研评价

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Supporting policy formulation is one of the significant reflections of the societal value of scientific research achievements, yet the intricate mechanisms of policy impact of scientific research achievements still remain unclear. This study focuses on the origins of policy impact, investigating the characteristics of policy impact produced by different types of academic papers. The relevant results can provide empirical evidence for scientific research managers to better understand and evaluate the societal value of scientific research achievements. [Design/Methodology] By delineating two primary dimensions of whether the research motivation is policy-oriented and whether the research content provides supportive or persuasive information, we construct a theoretical model for categorizing research articles in terms of policy impact. The specific implementation pathway for classifying different types is designed based on the abstracts of articles. Using articles within the field of biomedicine as an example, and following a framework of "policy impact diffusion – diverse impact comparison – research entity retrospective" to design multidimensional indicators, an empirical research is conducted to reveal the similarities and differences among different types of articles. [Findings/Conclusion] Among the articles with policy citations, policy-oriented papers under the types of action recommendation and decision support are more prevalent. Meanwhile, among the subset of articles with high policy citation counts, there is a higher proportion of papers that offer supportive information under the types of information provision and decision support. The immediacy and persistence of policy citations, along with the diversity of citing institutions and countries, all exhibit differentiated characteristics among these four types of articles. These articles demonstrate relatively consistent influence levels across different scenarios, particularly between online dissemination and policy support domains. From the subject perspective, a retrospective analysis of the causes of policy impacts reveals that international collaboration facilitates such impacts, and the four types of papers produced by different countries, along with their respective characteristics of policy impact, exhibit distinctive features. [Originality/Value] This study constructs a classification model and implementation framework for research articles from a policy impact perspective. It provides a new theoretical framework and methodological guidance for dissecting and understanding the policy impact of scientific research.

Keywords: Policy impact, Article classification, Research motivation, Research content, Scientific evaluation