图书情报知识 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 29-43.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2025.01.029

• 二十大精神研究阐释与践行·提升学术研究的政策影响力 • 上一篇    下一篇

如何提升中国学术论文的国际政策影响力——基于多维计量特征分析的策略研究

曹喆1,2 ,张琳1,2 ,尚媛媛3   

  1. 1.武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉,430072;
    2.武汉大学科教管理与评价中心,武汉,430072;
    3. 中国社会科学评价研究院,北京,100732
  • 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 张琳(ORCID: 0000-0003-0526-9677),博士,教授,研究方向:科学计量与科教政策评价,Email: linzhang1117@whu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:曹喆(ORCID: 0000-0002-9379-2013),博士研究生,研究方向:科学计量与科教政策评价,Email: caozhe@whu.edu.cn;尚媛媛(ORCID: 0000-0003-4219-2541),博士,助理研究员,研究方向:科学计量与科教政策评价,Email: shangafra@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家自然科学基金面上项目“从测度到理解:跨学科研究的成果分类、合作模式与影响扩散研究”(72374160)和国家自然科学基金专项项目“科学基金对基础研究发展的贡献识别与监测体系研究”(L2224005)的研究成果之一。

How to Enhance the International Policy Impact of Chinese Academic Papers: A Strategic Study Based on Multidimensional Quantitative Characteristics Analysis

CAO Zhe1,2 , ZHANG Lin1,2 , SHANG Yuanyuan3   

  1. 1. School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072;
    2. Center for Science, Technology & Education Assessment, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072;
    3. Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Evaluation Studies, Beijing, 100732
  • Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-03-19
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to ZHANG Lin, Email: linzhang1117@whu.edu.cn, ORCID: 0000-0003-0526-9677
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the project "From Indicators to Indicating: Outcome Classification, Collaboration Patterns, and Impact Diffusion of Interdisciplinary Research"(72374160)and the Special Project "Identifying and Monitoring the Contribution of Scientific Grants to the Development of Basic Research"(L2224005)supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China.

摘要: [目的/意义]致力于探究中国学术论文影响国际政策制定的策略,旨在为推动中国科学研究深度参与全球政策治理提供参考。[研究设计/方法]借鉴拉斯韦尔“5W”传播模式构建科学研究影响政策的理论模型,以联合国政策文件引用的中国学术论文为样本,从生产主体、研究内容和传播载体三个角度剖析其特征。[结论/发现]从生产主体来看,相当比例的样本集论文由非高校类机构产出,且中国机构与国际机构的合作现象突出;从研究内容来看,样本集论文的学科领域和细分主题分布呈现出鲜明的需求导向性;从传播载体来看,国际顶级学术期刊以及以解决现实问题和政策支撑为导向的期刊,其刊载的论文更容易产生政策影响,而中国机构在一些高政策显示度期刊上的发文有限。[创新/价值]构建了科学研究政策影响的“5W”分析框架并开展实证分析,提出了注重机构特色与政策服务目标的匹配、善用期刊力量提升研究成果在政策界的可见度,以及加强培育同国际重要机构的合作关系和中国学者在其中的任职机会三方面建议。

关键词: 政策影响, 中国学术论文, 联合国政策, 科学计量分析

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This study explores the strategies through which Chinese academic papers influence international policy-making, aiming to provide insights for enhancing China's role in global policy governance. [Design/Methodology] Drawing on Lasswell's "5W" model of communication, this study constructs a theoretical framework for examining the impact of scientific research on policy-making. Using Chinese academic papers cited in policy documents released by United Nations as research samples, the analysis delves into the characteristics from three key perspectives: the producing entities, research content, and dissemination carriers. [Findings/Conclusion] Regarding producing entities, a significant proportion of the sample papers set are produced by non-university institutions, with notable collaboration between Chinese and international institutions. In terms of research content, the distribution of disciplines and sub-themes in the sample papers show a strong demand orientation. As for dissemination carriers, papers published in top international academic journals and those focused on addressing real-world problems and providing policy support are more likely to influence policy-making. However, Chinese institutions have limited publications in high-policy-visibility journals. [Originality/Value] This study constructs a "5W" analytical framework for examining the impact of scientific research on policy-making and conducts an empirical analysis. It offers three recommendations: matching institutional characteristics with policy service goals, leveraging the power of journals to enhance the visibility of research results in the policy arena, and strengthening the cultivation of collaboration with major international institutions and the involvement opportunities of Chinese scholars in these institutions.

Keywords: Policy impact, Chinese academic paper, United Nations policy, Scientometric analysis