图书情报知识 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 110-123.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2026.01.110

• 情报、信息与共享 • 上一篇    下一篇

人工智能生成内容可信性的概念要素及情景适配研究

范昊, 王一帆, 郑佩, 贺皓然, 木热提江•木合塔尔   

  1. 武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉,430072
  • 出版日期:2026-01-10 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 王一帆(ORCID: 0000-0002-0903-8908),博士研究生,研究方向:信息内容分析与知识组织、人智交互,Email:yifwang@whu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:范昊(ORCID: 0000-0002-8537-8218),博士,教授,研究方向:数据智能、信息内容分析与挖掘、知识管理,Email:hfan@whu.edu.cn;郑佩(ORCID: 0009-0008-4148-0756),硕士研究生,研究方向:用户信息行为,Email: 2024281040170@whu.edu.cn;贺皓然(ORCID: 0009-0007-6302-2804),本科生,研究方向:大数据管理,Email: kevinhhr@163.com;木热提江•木合塔尔(ORCID: 0000-0002-1483-639X),博士研究生,研究方向:大模型评价,Email: 2019281040215@whu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家自然科学基金面上项目“‘资源+知识’双重驱动的生成式健康信息搜索可信性增强研究”(72474160)的研究成果之一。

Research on the Conceptual Elements and Scenario Adaptability of AI-Generated Content Trustworthiness

FAN Hao, WANG Yifan, ZHENG Pei, HE Haoran, Muretijiang Muhetaer   

  1. School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072
  • Online:2026-01-10 Published:2026-03-24
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to WANG Yifan, Email: yifwang@whu.edu.cn, ORCID: 0000-0002-0903-8908
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the project "Research on Credibility Enhancement Dual-Driven by Resource and Knowledge for Generative Health Information Search"(72474160)supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China.

摘要: [目的/意义]人工智能生成内容(AI-Generated Content, AIGC)的可信性问题已成为制约其广泛应用与社会接受的关键因素。系统梳理相关研究有助于厘清AIGC可信性的核心构成,为后续可信性评价体系与治理模型的研究提供理论支撑。[研究设计/方法]从主观感知和客观质量相结合的角度对AIGC可信性的概念进行辨析,明确其内涵与研究范畴;采用系统性综述方法,对AIGC可信性的多维要素进行提取与层次化分析,构建包含用户、内容、环境和技术四个维度的AIGC可信性概念要素体系,并划分典型任务情景,探讨AIGC可信性要素在不同情景下的关注差异与实现方式。[结论/发现]归纳形成多维度、多层次的AIGC可信性要素,并识别出查询、执行、分析、创造和决策五类情景下AIGC可信性的关注属性与施策方向,最后从增强方法、量化评价、协同机理和情景实现提出未来发展路径。[创新/价值]系统揭示了AIGC可信性的构成要素与情景适配特征,相关结论和建议可为推动AIGC高质量发展与价值实现提供理论支持。

关键词: 人工智能生成内容, 可信性要素, 情景适配

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] The trustworthiness of AI-Generated Content(AIGC)has emerged as a critical barrier to its broad deployment and social acceptance. A systematic review of relevant research can help clarify the foundational constructs underlying AIGC trustworthiness and provide theoretical support for future research on trustworthiness evaluation frameworks and governance models. [Design/Methodology] From the perspective of combining subjective perception and objective quality, this study dissected the concept of AIGC trustworthiness, clarifying its connotation and research scope. By adopting a systematic review approach, the multi-dimensional elements of AIGC trustworthiness were extracted and hierarchically analyzed. Then, it developed a conceptual framework of AIGC trustworthiness that encompassed four dimensions: users, content, environment, and technology. Furthermore, typical task scenarios were also categorized to explore the differences in key concerns and implementation approaches of AIGC trustworthiness elements. [Findings/Conclusion] This study identifies a set of multi-dimension and multi-layer AIGC trustworthiness elements, along with five categorized task scenarios, namely retrieval, execution, analysis, creation, and decision-making, each characterized by distinct trustworthiness concerns and strategic directions. Drawing on these insights, it outlines four future development pathways: methodological enhancement, quantitative evaluation, collaborative mechanisms, and scenario-based implementation. [Originality/Value] This study systematically elucidates the structural elements and scenario adaptability of AIGC trustworthiness. The results and recommendations offer theoretical insights to support the high-quality development of AIGC and its broader value realization.

Keywords: AI-Generated Content(AIGC), Trustworthiness elements, Scenario adaptability