图书情报知识 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 64-75.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2026.01.064

• 图书、文献与交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

智能向善:AI赋能公共图书馆弱势群体服务及其伦理风险规制路径

曾粤亮1, 吕晓龙2, 司莉2   

  1. 1.华中师范大学信息管理学院,武汉,430079;
    2.武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉,430072
  • 出版日期:2026-01-10 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 司莉(ORCID: 0000-0003-1028-8338),博士,教授,研究方向:数字素养,Email:lsiwhu@163.com。
  • 作者简介:曾粤亮(ORCID: 0000-0003-2460-7133),博士,副教授,研究方向:公共数字文化服务、数字包容,Email:zengyueliang2014@163.com;吕晓龙(ORCID: 0000-0002-1327-6044),博士研究生,研究方向:公共数字文化服务,Email: 2970610780@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“智能时代提升全民数字素养的理论和实践研究”(24&ZD179)的研究成果之一。

Artificial Intelligence for Good: The Practice of AI-enabled Public Library Services for Vulnerable Groups and Ethical Risk Regulation Paths

ZENG Yueliang1, LYU Xiaolong2, SI Li2   

  1. 1.School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079;
    2.School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072
  • Online:2026-01-10 Published:2026-03-24
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to SI Li, Email: lsiwhu@163.com, ORCID: 0000-0003-1028-8338
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the Major Project "Theoretical and Practical Research on Enhancing the Digital Literacy of the Entire Population in the Era of Intelligence"(24&ZD179)supported by National Social Science Foundation of China.

摘要: [目的/意义] AI技术应用已成为公共图书馆服务创新趋势,探究面向弱势群体服务的AI应用实践及其伦理风险规制路径,有助于推动形成负责任的AI应用生态。[研究设计/方法]综合文献研究和案例分析方法,阐释AI应用于公共图书馆弱势群体服务的意义,总结当前AI应用于公共图书馆弱势群体服务的主要实践类型,剖析主要的伦理风险,并借助社会技术系统理论提出其AI应用伦理风险规制路径。[结论/发现]主要实践包括:资源定位与语音导览服务、智能机器人阅读伴读与教育服务、无障碍智慧服务。存在算法偏见、技术依赖、信任危机、智能鸿沟等伦理风险。规制路径包括:加强馆员AI伦理认知与实践;创造学习与使用AI技术的友好环境;构建公共图书馆行业AI伦理规范,打造AI伦理学习与实践交流平台;融入AI无障碍技术并提供可信包容的AI服务。[创新/价值]引入社会技术系统理论,可为公共图书馆AI应用伦理风险识别与规制路径提供框架与针对性对策。

关键词: 公共图书馆, 弱势群体, 人工智能伦理, 伦理风险, AI素养, 社会技术系统

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] The application of AI technology has become a trend of service innovation in public libraries. Exploring the AI's practical applications in serving vulnerable groups in public libraries and the ethical risk regulation path of these applications can help promote the formation of a responsible AI application ecosystem. [Design/Methodology] Through combining literature research and case analysis methods, this study elucidates the significance of AI application in serving vulnerable groups in public libraries, summarizes the main practice types of current AI application, analyzes the key ethical risks, and proposes regulatory path based on socio-technical system theory. [Findings/Conclusion] The main practice types include: resource localization and audio guidance services, intelligent robots reading assistance and educational services, and barrier-free smart services. There are ethical risks such as algorithm bias, technological dependence, trust crisis, and AI divide. The ethical risk regulation approaches include: strengthening librarians' awareness and practice of AI ethics; creating a friendly environment for vulnerable groups to learn and use AI technology; establishing AI ethical standards for the public library industry and creating platforms for AI ethical learning and practice communication; integrating AI accessible technology to provide trustworthy and inclusive AI services. [Originality/Value] This study introduces socio-technical systems theory, which can provide a framework and targeted strategies for identifying and regulating ethical risks in AI applications in public libraries.

Keywords: Public library, Vulnerable groups, Artificial intelligence ethic, Ethical risk, Artificial intelligence literacy, Socio-Technical system