图书情报知识 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 51-63.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2026.01.051

• 学术聚焦(2)·科研人员的提示素养 • 上一篇    下一篇

人文社科研究者的提示词行为探究及提示素养培育启示——元认知活动视角

景雨田1, 赵宇翔1, 王杜荣1, 刘思琦2, 朱庆华1   

  1. 1.南京大学信息管理学院,南京,210023;
    2.中国人民大学信息资源管理学院,北京,100872
  • 出版日期:2026-01-10 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 赵宇翔(ORCID: 0000-0001-9281-3030),博士,教授,研究方向:用户信息行为、人机交互,Email: yxzhao@vip.163.com。
  • 作者简介:景雨田(ORCID: 0009-0006-4995-1271),博士研究生,研究方向:用户信息行为,Email: jingyt0406@163.com;王杜荣(ORCID: 0009-0006-6565-8841),博士研究生,研究方向:用户信息行为,Email: wdurong@163.com;刘思琦(ORCID: 0000-0002-4283-5861),博士研究生,研究方向:网络信息资源管理与利用,Email: liusiqi2121@ruc.edu.cn;朱庆华(ORCID: 0000-0002-4879-399X),博士,教授,研究方向:健康信息学、社会化媒体,Email: qhzhu@nju.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“智能时代提升全民数字素养的理论和实践研究”(24&ZD180)的研究成果之一。

Investigation on the Prompting Behavior Among Humanities and Social Sciences Researchers and the Implications for Prompt Literacy Promotion: A Metacognitive Perspective

JING Yutian1, ZHAO Yuxiang1, WANG Durong1, LIU Siqi2, ZHU Qinghua1   

  1. 1.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023 ;
    2.School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872
  • Online:2026-01-10 Published:2026-03-24
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to ZHAO Yuxiang, Email: yxzhao@vip.163.com, ORCID: 0000-0001-9281-3030
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the Major Project "Theoretical and Practical Research on Enhancing Digital Literacy of the General Public in the Age of Intelligence"(24&ZD180)supported by National Social Science Foundation of China.

摘要: [目的/意义]旨在丰富生成式人工智能(Generative Artificial Intelligence, GenAI)情境下对用户人智交互行为的探索,为人文社科研究者的提示素养培育工作提供对策建议。[研究设计/方法]基于元认知理论,采用日记研究法展开纵向追踪,借鉴Gioia方法论对25位人文社科研究者的访谈数据进行编码分析并构建模型。[结论/发现]人文社科研究者的提示词行为演化呈现出显著的阶段性特征,包括探索适应、策略建构与调控、迁移和创新。同时,识别出了试探型、结构化和高阶提示设计三类提示词行为,以及与之对应的适应性信息交互、策略性信息交互、协同式共创交互三类阶段。此外,元认知知识、体验和调控对不同阶段的提示素养培育产生影响,在此基础上构建了“元认知活动-提示词行为-提示素养”整合模型。[创新/价值]拓展了元认知理论在人智交互中的应用边界,为人文社科研究者提示素养培育提供理论参考与实践启示。

关键词: 提示素养, 提示词行为, 元认知理论, 人文社科研究者, 人智交互

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] The study aims to enrich the understanding of human–AI interaction behaviors in the context of Generative Artificial Intelligence(GenAI), and to provide suggestions for cultivating prompt literacy among humanities and social science researchers. [Design/Methodology] Based on metacognitive theory, this study conducts a longitudinal tracking study using the diary research method . The interview data from 25 humanities and social science researchers are coded and analyzed by drawing on the methodology of Gioia and subsequently a model is constructed. [Findings/Conclusion] The evolution of prompting behavior among humanities and social science researchers shows distinct phased characteristics, including exploration and adaptation, strategy construction and regulation, transfer and innovation. The study also identifies three types of prompting behaviors: exploratory, structured, and high-level prompt design, as well as the corresponding three stages of adaptive information interactions, strategic information interactions, and collaborative co-creation interactions. Furthermore, metacognitive knowledge, experience, and regulation have an impact on the cultivation of prompt literacy at different stages. Based on this, this study constructs an integrated model of "Metacognitive Activities–Prompting Behavior–Prompt Literacy". [Originality/Value] The study extends the application boundaries of metacognitive theory in the context of human-AI interaction and provides both theoretical foundations and practical implications for cultivating prompt literacy among humanities and social sciences researchers.

Keywords: Prompt literacy, Prompting behavior, Metacognitive Theory, Humanities and social science researchers, Human-AI interaction