图书情报知识 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 28-42.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2026.04.028

• 学术聚焦(1)·人工智能与科学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

大语言模型在学术写作中的渗透程度及其结构特征——基于群体文本词汇分布的测度框架

胡乐天1,2, 杨杰1,2, 王凡铭1,2, 邓三鸿1,2   

  1. 1.南京大学信息管理学院,南京,210023;
    2.江苏省数据工程与知识服务重点实验室,南京,210023
  • 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-10-06
  • 通讯作者: 邓三鸿(ORCID: 0000-0002-6910-3935),博士,教授,研究方向:信息分析、科学计量等,Email: sanhong@nju.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:胡乐天(ORCID: 0000-0001-6231-9912),硕士研究生,研究方向:生成式人工智能,Email: letianhu@smail.nju.edu.cn;杨杰(ORCID:0000-0002-1276-0483),博士后,研究方向:科学计量、创新评价,Email: alexjieyang@outlook.com;王凡铭(ORCID: 0009-0007-4487-7532),博士研究生,研究方向:人机交互,Email: 527288991@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目“基于领域集体智慧挖掘的颠覆性范式变革预测研究”(25ATQ008)的研究成果之一。

The Penetration of Large Language Models in Academic Writing and Its Structural Characteristics: A Measurement Framework Based on Population-Level Lexical Distribution

HU Letian1,2, YANG AlexJie1,2, WANG Fanming1,2, DENG Sanhong1,2   

  1. 1.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023;
    2.Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Service, Nanjing, 210023
  • Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-10-06
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to DENG Sanhong, Email: sanhong@nju.edu.cn, ORCID: 0000-0002-6910-3935
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the Key Project "Predictive Research on Disruptive Paradigm Shifts Based on Domain Collective Intelligence Mining"(25ATQ008)supported by National Social Science Foundation of China.

摘要: [目的/意义] 旨在量化大语言模型在科学知识生产中的渗透程度及结构特征,为理解科研范式演变和学术规范重构提供参考。[研究设计/方法] 基于2020—2025年图书情报领域SSCI论文摘要数据,构建了一种基于最大似然估计的群体统计框架,在验证了框架的稳定性与可解释性后,对学术文本中的大语言模型生成比例进行了时间趋势与多维度异质性分析。[结论/发现] 图书情报领域学术文本中的大语言模型生成比例在2023年出现了结构断点,2024年呈现指数级爆发,2025年下半年已经达到15.4%;高学术影响力、高跨学科性论文的大语言模型生成比例显著更高,而高创新性论文的比例显著偏低;同时,大语言模型的使用也为科学研究带来了语言和资源的平权效应。[创新/价值] 提供了一种可解释的大语言模型使用测度新视角,为改革学术规范与评价制度、明确人工智能使用边界及防范学术内容同质化提供了理论价值与实践指导。

关键词: 大语言模型, 学术写作, 图书情报领域, 最大似然估计, 文本生成检测

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This study aims to quantify the extent to which large language models have penetrated scientific knowledge production and to identify their structural characteristics, thereby providing insights for understanding the evolution of scientific research paradigms and the restructuring of academic norms. [Design/Methodology] Based on the abstract data from SSCI-indexed papers in the field of Information Science & Library Science from 2020 to 2025, we constructed a population-level statistical framework based on maximum likelihood estimation. After verifying the framework's stability and interpretability, we conducted a time-series trend analysis and multidimensional heterogeneity analysis of the proportion of large language model-generated content in academic texts. [Findings/Conclusion] The proportion of text generated by large language models in academic texts within the Information Science & Library Science field experienced a structural breakpoint in 2023, followed by an exponential surge in 2024, reaching 15.4% by the second half of 2025. The proportion of large language model-generated papers is significantly higher among papers with high academic impact and high interdisciplinarity diversity, while it is significantly lower among highly innovative papers. At the same time, large language model adoption has fostered linguistic and resource equity in scientific research. [Originality/Value] This study offers an interpretable perspective on measuring the use of large language models, providing theoretical value and practical guidance for reforming academic norms and evaluation systems, clarifying the boundaries of AI use, and preventing the homogenization of academic content.

Keywords: Large Language Models, Academic writing, Information Science & Library Science, Maximum likelihood estimation, Text generation detection