图书情报知识 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 115-126.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2026.04.115

• 知识、学习与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

生成式AI时代的大学生提示素养教育:理论内涵、实践探索与路径优化

杜瑾   

  1. 中央美术学院图书馆,北京,100102
  • 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-10-06
  • 通讯作者: 杜瑾(ORCID: 0000-0002-5577-7680),硕士,馆员,研究方向:信息素养教育和人工智能素养教育,Email: dujinyeah@126.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系2022年中央美术学院自主科研项目暨中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“智能时代视觉艺术专业学生信息素养与思维能力的协同培养路径研究”(2022QD020)的研究成果之一。

Prompt Literacy Education for University Students in the Generative AI Era: Theory, Practice, and Optimization

DU Jin   

  1. Central Academy of Fine Arts Library, Beijing, 100102
  • Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-10-06
  • Contact: Correspondence should be addressed to DU Jin, Email: dujinyeah@126.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-5577-7680
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the project "Research on the Collaborative Cultivation Path of Information Literacy and Thinking Ability of Visual Arts Students in the Intelligent Era"(2022QD020)supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China and a grant from the 2022 Independent Research Program of the Central Academy of Fine Arts of China.

摘要: [目的/意义]生成式AI的普及使提示素养成为数智时代大学生的核心竞争力。厘清大学生提示素养的内涵,探讨提示素养教育实践的发展路径,有助于为高等教育应对技术浪潮、重构人才素养维度提供理论依据。[研究设计/方法]通过文献调研与案例梳理,界定提示素养的理论内涵,从高校教学、图书馆服务及社会化协同等视角,剖析当前国内外提示素养教育实践探索的现状与瓶颈问题。[结论/发现]当前提示素养教育存在理论框架不完善、教学内容深度不足、高阶逻辑思维培养欠缺等问题。针对现存问题,应构建高校、图书馆与社会深度融合的生态体系,设计系统全面的内容体系,开发通识教育与实践递进式课程体系,并建立教学评估与动态评价机制。[创新/价值]夯实了提示素养的跨学科理论基础,构建了涵盖主体、内容和评价体系的协同培养机制,对AI时代大学生提示素养提升具有理论和实践参考价值。

关键词: 生成式人工智能, 提示素养, 人工智能素养, 大学生, 大语言模型

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] The widespread adoption of generative AI has made prompt literacy a core competency for university students in the digital-intelligence era. Clarifying the connotation of prompt literacy and exploring development paths for educational practice can provide a theoretical basis for higher education to respond to technological waves and reconstruct the dimensions of talent literacy. [Design/Methodology] Through literature research and case analysis, this article defines the theoretical connotation of prompt literacy. From the perspectives such as university teaching, library services, and social collaboration, it examines the current status and bottleneck issues of prompt literacy education practices in both domestic and international contexts. [Findings/Conclusion] At present, prompt literacy education faces a series of problems, such as incomplete theoretical frameworks, insufficient depth in teaching content, and a lack of high-order logical thinking cultivation. To address existing challenges, it is necessary to build an ecosystem deeply integrating universities, libraries, and society, design a systematic and comprehensive content system, develop a progressive curriculum system, combining general education and practice training, and establish teaching assessment and dynamic evaluation mechanisms. [Originality/Value] The interdisciplinary theoretical foundations of prompt literacy has been established, a collaborative cultivation mechanism covering curriculum subjects, instructional content, and evaluation systems has been constructed. It provides both theoretical insights and practical reference value for improving university students' prompt literacy in the AI era.

Keywords: Generative AI, Prompt literacy, AI literacy, College students, Large Language Models