图书情报知识 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 98-111.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2023.01.098

• 青年学者论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会公平视阈下中美开放政府数据政策的批判性话语分析

罗博,朱丘毅,张晋朝   

  • 出版日期:2023-01-10 发布日期:2023-04-12

A Critical Discourse Analysis on Open Government Data Policies of China and the United States from the Perspective of Social Justice

  • Online:2023-01-10 Published:2023-04-12

摘要: [目的/意义]分析开放政府数据政策蕴含的公平价值、话语策略及其社会影响,为规范开放数据流动与利用、促进数据公共价值的实现提供思路。[研究设计/方法]基于组织公平理论与批判性话语分析框架,选取中美两国不同时期具有节点意义的全国性开放政府数据政策,对其进行文本向度的关键词、词丛与公平维度分析,并从话语实践向度分析两国政策输出公平价值的话语策略及其演变,最后结合社会实践向度,讨论政策话语对开放数据实践公平秩序的影响。[结论/发现]两国开放政府数据政策对公平价值的话语建构经历了从法理上的权利平等、经济层面的价值导向,向社会学意义的普适公平的渐进发展,其间对程序公平、信息公平与分配 公平各有侧重,并运用互文、连贯等话语策略嵌入这一价值,进而作用于开放政府数据实践的平等化、价值化、冲突化趋势中。[创新/价值]从理论层面探讨中美开放政府数据政策的公平价值及其话语构建策略,阐释政策话语对开放数据实践的影响;实践层面为政府数据治理厘清方向,并为开放数据政策体系的完善提供启示。


关键词: 开放政府数据, 社会公平, 话语分析, 政策分析

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This study aims to explore the justice values, discourse strategies and social impact of open government data policies, which provides reference for regulating the flow and utilization of open data and promoting the realization of its public value. [Design/Methodology] Based on organizational justice theory and critical discourse analysis framework, the national open government data policies documents with significance in different periods of China and the United States were selected and analyzed in terms of keywords, word clusters and justice dimensions in the text level. Then, the discourse strategies and evolution of justice values of the two countries' policies were analyzed from the perspective of discourse practice. Finally, combined with the perspective of social practice, this study discussed the impact of policy discourse on the fair order of open data practices. [Findings/Conclusion] The discourse construction of social justice in the open government data policies of China and the United States has undergone a gradual development from the jurisprudential equality of rights and economic value orientation to the universal fairness in the sociological sense, intertwined with different focus on procedural justice, information justice and distributive justice. The discourse strategies of intertextuality and coherence are employed in these policies to embed the justice values, which in turn contribute to the trend of equalization, value maximization and conflict in the open government data practice.  [Originality/Value] Theoretically, this study explores the justice values and discourse construction strategies of open government data policies in China and the United States, and explains the impact of policy discourse on open data practice. Practically, the results of this study clarify the direction of government data governance and provide insights for the improvement of open data policies.


Keywords: Open government data, Social justice, Discourse analysis, Policy analysis