图书情报知识 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 137-150.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2023.01.137

• 情报、信息与共享 • 上一篇    下一篇

21世纪信息公平研究:脉络、结构与展望

樊振佳,史文杰   

  • 出版日期:2023-01-10 发布日期:2023-04-12

Information Equity Since the 21st Century: Evolution, Structure and Prospect

  • Online:2023-01-10 Published:2023-04-12

摘要: [目的/意义]信息公平,作为社会公平的重要组成部分,引起了学界的广泛关注。对国内外相关文献进行系统回顾和分析,对深入推进相关研究具有参考意义。[研究设计/方法]本研究以Web of Science数据库和CNKI数据库的CSSCI期刊为数据源,收集了2000年至今的相关文献,采用系统性文献综述方法,从信息公平的概念、研究对象、影响因素、保障措施四个维度剖析相关研究,并构建了相关维度的结构框架。[结论/发现]研究发现,国内信息公平相关研究以图情学科最具代表性,以信息机构(如公共图书馆)为研究对象者居多;国外相关研究涉及学科相对宽泛,关注对象呈现多元化;信息公平影响因素包括资源的结构性失衡、主体信息能力分化、信息活动情境的约束等;保障措施体现在信息资源普遍供给、信息能力培养、法制与道德完善等方面。[创新/价值]构建了信息公平研究的整体性结构框架,据此有助于揭示当前信息公平研究进展、不足之处以及未来的研究方向。

关键词: 信息公平, 数字鸿沟, 信息分化, 弱势群体

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] As an indispensable part of social equity, information equity has attracted extensive attention from academia.The primary objective of this article is to systematically review and analyze relevant literature in such a field,which is of reference significance for further research. [Design/Methodology] In this study , Web of Science,CSSCI journals in CNKI data base are used as the data source, relevant articles are collected from 2000 to the present,a systematic literature review method is adopted to analyze from four dimensions: concept,research object, influencing factors and measures. Meanwhile,a structural framework of the relevant dimensions is constructed. [Findings/Conclusion] The results indicate that the research on information equity in China is mainly concentrated in LIS discipline, and the information institutions(such as public libraries)are the majority of the research objects. Related research abroad involves a relatively broad range of disciplines and focuses on the diversity of objects.Thefactors that affect information equity include the structural imbalance of resources, the differentiation of subject's information capability, and the constraints of information practice context. Corresponding measures are embodied in the general supply of information resources, the empowerment of information capability, the regulations of law and morality, etc. [Originality/Value] A holistic structural framework for the study of information equity is constructed, which is contributed to reveal the advances, shortcomings and future orientations in the field of information equity research.

Key words: Information equity, Digital divide, Information differentiation, Vulnerable groups