图书情报知识 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 45-55.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2023.01.045

• 专题 · 算法治理 • 上一篇    下一篇

作为规则的推荐算法:演进与法律治理

胡凌   

  • 出版日期:2023-01-10 发布日期:2023-04-12

Recommendation Algorithm as Rule: Evolution and Legal Governance

  • Online:2023-01-10 Published:2023-04-12

摘要: [目的/意义]为人工智能技术应用进行立法已经成为世界趋势,探讨算法规则化有助于深入研究如何实现算法服务应用分级分类监管的更为细化的目标。[研究设计/方法]在文献调研和比较分析的基础上,结合政治经济学理论、政治学理论等多学科思维,多角度分析算法规则化的内涵、现实意义、理论基础和实施路径。[结论/发现]从数字经济的生产方式角度看,算法主要服务于市场要素流动,根据市场和社会功能的不同类型可以分为生产性和辅助性两类,后者更加接近于某种公共基础设施。伴随平台生态的复杂化和平台主体责任不断深化,算法的规则化需求逐渐出现,并因功能与服务领域而异。算法成为规则的程度还取决于监管部门和平台企业(特别是大型平台)所处的发包治理结构。[创新/价值]将算法看成是数字经济生产方式的一部分,其意义在于更加自动化地推动市场要素的生产和流动,并维护相关市场中的交易秩序;研究视角有助于推进对中国算法监管的理解。


关键词: 算法, 规则, 生产方式, 发包制, 平台企业

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Legislating for the application of AI technology has become a trend in the world, and exploring algorithm regularization can help delve into how to achieve a more refined goal of hierarchical and categorical regulation of algorithmic service applications. [Design/Methodology] On the basis of literature research and comparative analysis, combined with multi-disciplinary thinking of political economy theory and political science theory, this paper analyzes the connotation, practical significance, theoretical basis and implementation path of algorithm regularization from multiple perspectives. [Findings/Conclusion] From the perspective of the production mode of digital economy, algorithms mainly serve the flow of market factors.According to different types of market and social functions, algorithms can be divided into two categories, production and auxiliary, the latter is closer to some kind of public infrastructure. Along with the complexity of the platform ecology and the deepening of the responsibility of the platform subjects, the rule-based demand of algorithms gradually emerges and change with different functions and service areas. The extent to which algorithms become rules also depends on the regulators and the subcontracting governance structure embedded by platform companies(especially large ones).[Originality/Value] In this study, algorithms are not viewed as isolated part of the mode of production of the digital economy. Its significance is to promote the promotion of the production and flow of market factors more automatically and maintain the trading order in the relevant markets.The perspective of this paper helps to advance the understanding of algorithmic regulation in China.

Key words: Algorithm, Rule, Mode of production, Subcontract system, Platform company