图书情报知识 ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 24-34.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2017.06.024

• 图书、文献与交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国图书情报学国际化发展的现状与趋势

童寿传,李江,李东   

  • 出版日期:2017-11-10 发布日期:2017-11-10

The Development and Trend of China’s International Publications in the Field of Library and Information Science

  • Online:2017-11-10 Published:2017-11-10

摘要:

论文基于SSCI数据库收录的中国大陆于1998—2016年发表的2251篇图书情报学论文,首先从发文量、被引次数、加权被引次数、合作国家/地区、热点研究主题等角度回顾我国图书情报学的国际化发展历程;然后,从参考文献中分析我国图书情报学发展的知识来源的学科变化;最后,从施引文献的国家/地区和学科分类中分析我国图书情报学知识的去向。研究发现:①我国图书情报学领域国际论文被SSCI收录的文献数量总体呈指数上升趋势,同时,影响力在逐步增长;②我国图书情报学国际化进程中的合作对象为美国、比利时、中国台湾、澳大利亚等国家/地区;③我国图书情报学国际论文的热点主题主要包括信息技术与信息系统、信息计量等;④我国图书情报学国际成果的知识主要来源于学科内自引,其次是管理学、计算机信息系统等学科;⑤我国图书情报学知识主要流向国内,其次是美国、中国台湾等国家/地区;主要流向学科内(占比高达59%),其次是交叉科学、管理学等学科。基于实证分析结果,论文提出了我国图书情报学未来应该重点发展的两大方向:①进一步科学化,强调描述性推论与因果推论的研究方法;②从学科交叉中寻找新的学科生长点。

关键词: 图书情报学, 中国, 国际化, 文献计量学, 学科交叉, 科学化

Abstract:

Based on the 2,251 SSCI publications of Mainland China during 19982016, this paper retrospectively analyzed the internationalization of China’s Library Information Science(LIS) at first. Secondly, with works cited, it explored the discipline development where the knowledge that supported the internationalization of China’s LIS were from. Lastly, it predicted  the future of LIS in light of country/territories and disciplines of the cited documents. Findings include, (1) the number of SSCI publications in China’s LIS increased exponentially, and the impact grew with time; (2) China preferred to collaborate with USA, Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands, Singapore, Australia, etc.; (3) the hotspots of China’s LIS involved Information System and Informetrics; (4) the knowledge origin of China’s LIS heavily relied on selfcitations within LIS, then, Management, Information System, and etc.; (5) China’s LIS knowledge mainly diffused into LIS, accounting for as high as 59%, then, Interdisciplinary Sciences and Management from the perspective of disciplines; and into China, USA, and etc. At last, this paper proposed potential trend of China’s LIS. One is its deepening scientific nature, which means China’s LIS scholars should attach importance to descriptive inference and causal inference in their research. The other is that China’s LIS should seek growth point from interdisciplinary research.

Key words: Library and information science, China, Internationalization, Bibliometrics, Interdisciplinary, Scientification