图书情报知识 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 97-108.doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2020.03.097

• 图书、文献与交流 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字图书馆信息服务的融合与创新——基于2019年JCDL年会论文的综述

梁少博,吴丹   

  • 出版日期:2020-05-10 发布日期:2020-05-20

Integration and Innovation of Information Service in Digital Library: Literature Review on the JCDL 2019

  • Online:2020-05-10 Published:2020-05-20

摘要: [目的/意义]本文通过对2019年国际数字图书馆联合会议(Joint Conference on Digital Library, JCDL)的录用论文进行整体回顾,梳理了本届年会的最新研究成果与学科发展动态,以助国内图情领域学者更好地了解本届年会成果,把握国际数字图书馆领域研究的前沿热点问题。[研究设计/方法]采用文献综述的方法进行研究。[结论/发现] 本届年会更加关注数字图书馆如何通过多源数据的融合、数字人文馆藏资源的利用等实现信息服务深度融合;数字图书馆如何通过海量大数据挖掘与利用、用户行为分析提升其服务水平;如何通过对学术文本资源深入挖掘,实现信息计量学在学术评审、学术评价等方面的创新应用。[创新/价值]本文揭示了国际数字图书馆领域的最新发展态势,展望了未来数字图书馆领域的学术前沿方向。

关键词: 国际数字图书馆联合会议(JCDL), 数字图书馆, 信息服务, 数字人文, 信息行为, 信息推荐, 学术评价

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance]This article systematically reviews the accepted papers of Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2019 (JCDL), and introduces the latest research and the disciplinary development trends. It intends to help domestic scholars in the domain of library and information science better understand the research achievements of JCDL 2019 and the cutting-edge hotspots of international digital library. [Design/Methodology]A literature review was conducted in this paper.
[Findings/Conclusion]JCDL 2019 pays more attention to how digital libraries can achieve a deep integration of informationservices through the fusion of multi-source data and the utilization of digital humanities collection resources. Researchers also focus on how digital libraries can improve the service through the mining and utilization of massive data and the analysis of user behavior. In addition, there is also a focus on the innovative application of informatics in academic accreditation and evaluation through in-depth mining of scholar resources.[Originality/Value]This paper reveals the latest development trend and forecasts the academic cutting-edge directions of digital library in the future.

Keywords: Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), Digital library, Information service, Digital humanities, Information behavior, Information recommendation, Academic evaluation